Panel
Cost (least,medium,most ) - most
Complexity - hard
Durability (1-10) - 7
Materials needed
Panels ( cardboard )
Aluminum
Pot
Circular Metal stand
String
Hole puncher
Box
Cost ( least, medium, most ) - least
Complexity - easy
Durability (1-10) - 9
Materials needed
Box
Cost ( least, medium, most ) - least
Complexity - easy
Durability (1-10) - 9
Materials needed
Box
Complexity- medium
Durability (1-10) - 6
Materials needed
Aluminum
Cardboard
Stand ( wood ) or whatevs
Metal holder
( Parobolic )
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-hnAtzYzGicjA4lZUopBhscrjQcZQ0HANkPp7aLyYU3IOMvDw72YTF-gpgz6AWST8Nm7g4cPzCKSADv7Ntekfcn4X1KGBEfm05sm4h4gCxpRXexoE6Fm4BvOa71xNTmpWbwBj0fxMl80/s1600/rudra+sk+14.JPG
( Box )
http://mamaguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/solar-oven-005-640x491.jpg
( Panel )
http://solarcooking.org/images/scr/apr05/photor.jpg
As I researched each box cooker, I believe that the box cooker is the best. The complexity of the box cooker is fairly east but, the way it cooks food can help many people out. The box cooker is the most affordable, the most durable, and it's simple. The only con to this is that box cooker cooks really slow.
I also liked the parobolic cooker as well. The complexity of the parobolic is not as complex as the panel. ( my first decision ) I would call it the intermediate cooker. The in between of the panel and the box. The parobolic cooker is more expensive so not AS affordable ( depending on what you use ) .
The parabolic cooks the fastest out of all of the cookers in my opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment